URL redirection

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
For redirection on Wikipedia, see Wikipedia:Redirect.

URL redirection, also called URL forwarding, is a World Wide Web technique for making a web page available under more than one URL address. When a web browser attempts to open a URL that has been redirected, a page with a different URL is opened.

Similarly, domain redirection or domain forwarding is when all pages in a URL domain are redirected to a different domain, as when wikipedia.comand wikipedia.net are automatically redirected to wikipedia.org.

URL redirection can be used for URL shortening, to prevent broken links when web pages are moved, to allow multiple domain names belonging to the same owner to refer to a single web site, to guide navigation into and out of a website, for privacy protection, and for less innocuous purposes such asphishing attacks.


There are several reasons to use URL redirection :

Similar domain names[edit]

A user might mistype a URL, for example, “example.com” and “exmaple.com”. Organizations often register these “misspelled” domains and redirect them to the “correct” location: example.com. The addresses example.com and example.net could both redirect to a single domain, or web page, such as example.org. This technique is often used to “reserve” other top-level domains (TLD) with the same name, or make it easier for a true “.edu” or “.net” to redirect to a more recognizable “.com” domain.

Moving pages to a new domain[edit]

Web pages may be redirected to a new domain for three reasons:

  • a site might desire, or need, to change its domain name;
  • an author might move his or her individual pages to a new domain;
  • two web sites might merge.

With URL redirects, incoming links to an outdated URL can be sent to the correct location. These links might be from other sites that have not realized that there is a change or from bookmarks/favorites that users have saved in their browsers.

The same applies to search engines. They often have the older/outdated domain names and links in their database and will send search users to these old URLs. By using a “moved permanently” redirect to the new URL, visitors will still end up at the correct page. Also, in the next search engine pass, the search engine should detect and use the newer URL.

Logging outgoing links[edit]

The access logs of most web servers keep detailed information about where visitors came from and how they browsed the hosted site. They do not, however, log which links visitors left by. This is because the visitor’s browser has no need to communicate with the original server when the visitor clicks on an outgoing link.

This information can be captured in several ways. One way involves URL redirection. Instead of sending the visitor straight to the other site, links on the site can direct to a URL on the original website’s domain that automatically redirects to the real target. This technique bears the downside of the delay caused by the additional request to the original website’s server. As this added request will leave a trace in the server log, revealing exactly which link was followed, it can also be a privacy issue.[1]

The same technique is also used by some corporate websites to implement a statement that the subsequent content is at another site, and therefore not necessarily affiliated with the corporation. In such scenarios, displaying the warning causes an additional delay.

Short aliases for long URLs[edit]

Main article: URL shortening

Web applications often include lengthy descriptive attributes in their URLs which represent data hierarchies, command structures, transaction paths and session information. This practice results in a URL that is aesthetically unpleasant and difficult to remember, and which may not fit within the size limitations of microblogging sites. URL shortening services provide a solution to this problem by redirecting a user to a longer URL from a shorter one.

Meaningful, persistent aliases for long or changing URLs[edit]

See also: Permalink, PURL and Link rot

Sometimes the URL of a page changes even though the content stays the same. Therefore URL redirection can help users who have bookmarks. This is routinely done on Wikipedia whenever a page is renamed.


Main article: Post/Redirect/Get

Post/Redirect/Get (PRG) is a web development design pattern that prevents some duplicate form submissions, creating a more intuitive interface for user agents (users).

Manipulating search engines[edit]

Redirect techniques are used to fool search engines. For example, one page could show popular search terms to search engines but redirect the visitors to a different target page. There are also cases where redirects have been used to “steal” the page rank of one popular page and use it for a different page, They will also redirect using searches with search engines as searches, usually involving the 302 HTTP status code of “moved temporarily.”[2][3]

Search engine providers have noticed the problem and are working on appropriate actions.[citation needed]

As a result, today, such manipulations usually result in less rather than more site exposure.

Manipulating visitors[edit]

URL redirection is sometimes used as a part of phishing attacks that confuse visitors about which web site they are visiting.[citation needed] Because modern browsers always show the real URL in the address bar, the threat is lessened. However, redirects can also take you to sites that will otherwise attempt to attack in other ways. For example, a redirect might take a user to a site that would attempt to trick them into downloading antivirus software and, ironically, installing a trojan of some sort instead.

Removing referer information[edit]

When a link is clicked, the browser sends along in the HTTP request a field called referer which indicates the source of the link. This field is populated with the URL of the current web page, and will end up in the logs of the server serving the external link. Since sensitive pages may have sensitive URLs (for example, http://company.com/plans-for-the-next-release-of-our-product), it is not desirable for the referer URL to leave the organization. A redirection page that performs referrer hiding could be embedded in all external URLs, transforming for example http://externalsite.com/page intohttp://redirect.company.com/http://externalsite.com/page. This technique also eliminates other potentially sensitive information from the referer URL, such as the session ID, and can reduce the chance of phishing by indicating to the end user that they passed a clear gateway to another site.


Several different kinds of response to the browser will result in a redirection. These vary in whether they affect HTTP headers or HTML content. The techniques used typically depend on the role of the person implementing it and their access to different parts of the system. For example, a web author with no control over the headers might use a Refresh meta tag whereas a web server administrator redirecting all pages on a site is more likely to use server configuration.

Manual redirect[edit]

The simplest technique is to ask the visitor to follow a link to the new page, usually using an HTML anchor like:

Please follow <a href="http://www.example.com/">this link</a>.

This method is often used as a fall-back — if the browser does not support the automatic redirect, the visitor can still reach the target document by following the link.

HTTP status codes 3xx[edit]

In the HTTP protocol used by the World Wide Web, a redirect is a response with a status code beginning with 3 that causes a browser to display a different page. The different codes describe the reason for the redirect, which allows for the correct subsequent action (such as changing links in the case of code 301, a permanent change of address).

HTTP/1.1 defines several status codes for redirection:

  • 300 multiple choices (e.g. offer different languages)
  • 301 moved permanently
  • 302 found (originally “temporary redirect” in HTTP/1.0 and popularly used for CGI scripts; superseded by 303 and 307 in HTTP/1.1 but preserved for backward compatibility)
  • 303 see other (forces a GET request to the new URL even if original request was POST)
  • 307 temporary redirect (provides a new URL for the browser to resubmit a GET or POST request)

All of these status codes require that the URL of the redirect target be given in the Location: header of the HTTP response. The 300 multiple choices will usually list all choices in the body of the message and show the default choice in the Location: header.

(Status codes 304 not modified and 305 use proxy are not redirects).

An HTTP response with the 301 “moved permanently” redirect looks like this:

HTTP/1.1 301 Moved Permanently
Location: http://www.example.org/
Content-Type: text/html
Content-Length: 174

<p>This page has moved to <a href="http://www.example.org/">http://www.example.org/</a>.</p>

Using server-side scripting for redirection[edit]

Web authors producing HTML content can’t usually create redirects using HTTP headers as these are generated automatically by the web server program when serving an HTML file. The same is usually true even for programmers writing CGI scripts, though some servers allow scripts to add custom headers (e.g. by enabling “non-parsed-headers”). Many web servers will generate a 3xx status code if a script outputs a “Location:” header line. For example, inPHP, one can use the “header” function:

header('HTTP/1.1 301 Moved Permanently');
header('Location: http://www.example.com/');

(More headers may be required to prevent caching[4]).

The programmer must ensure that the headers are output before the body. This may not fit easily with the natural flow of control through the code. To help with this, some frameworks for server-side content generation can buffer the body data. In the ASP scripting language, this can also be accomplished usingresponse.buffer=true and response.redirect "http://www.example.com/"

HTTP/1.1 allows for either a relative URI reference or an absolute URI reference. If the URI reference is relative the client computes the required absolute URI reference according to the rules defined in RFC 3986.

Apache mod_rewrite[edit]

The Apache HTTP Server‘s mod_alias extension can be used to redirect certain requests. Typical configuration directives look like:

Redirect permanent /oldpage.html http://www.example.com/newpage.html
Redirect 301 /oldpage.html http://www.example.com/newpage.html

For more flexible URL rewriting and redirection, Apache mod_rewrite can be used. E.g. to redirect a requests to a canonical domain name:

RewriteEngine on
RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^([^.:]+\.)*oldsite\.example\.com\.?(:[0-9]*)?$ [NC]
RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://newsite.example.net/$1 [R=301,L]

Such configuration can be applied to one or all sites on the server through the server configuration files or to a single content directory through a.htaccess file.

nginx rewrite[edit]

Nginx has an integrated http rewrite module,[5] which can be used to perform advanced URL processing and even web-page generation (with the returndirective). A showing example of such advanced use of the rewrite module is mdoc.su, which implements a deterministic URL shortening service entirely with the help of nginx configuration language alone.[6][7]

For example, if a request for /DragonFlyBSD/HAMMER.5 were to come along, it would first be redirected internally to /d/HAMMER.5 with the first rewrite directive below (only affecting the internal state, without any HTTP replies issued to the client just yet), and then with the second rewrite directive, an HTTP response with a 302 Found status code would be issued to the client to actually redirect to the external cgi script of web-man:[8]

	location /DragonFly {
		rewrite	^/DragonFly(BSD)?([,/].*)?$	/d$2	last;
	location /d {
		set	$db	"http://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/cgi/web-man?command=";
		set	$ds	"&section=";
		rewrite	^/./([^/]+)\.([1-9])$		$db$1$ds$2	redirect;

Refresh Meta tag and HTTP refresh header[edit]

Netscape introduced the meta refresh feature which refreshes a page after a certain amount of time. This can specify a new URL to replace one page with another. This is supported by most web browsers. See

A timeout of zero seconds effects an immediate redirect. This is treated like a 301 permanent redirect by Google, allowing transfer of PageRank to the target page.[9]

This is an example of a simple HTML document that uses this technique:

<meta http-equiv="Refresh" content="0; url=http://www.example.com/" />
<p>Please follow <a href="http://www.example.com/">this link</a>.</p>

This technique can be used by web authors because the meta tag is contained inside the document itself. The meta tag must be placed in the “head” section of the HTML file. The number “0” in this example may be replaced by another number to achieve a delay of that many seconds. The anchor in the “body” section is for users whose browsers do not support this feature.

The same effect can be achieved with an HTTP refresh header:

HTTP/1.1 200 ok
Refresh: 0; url=http://www.example.com/
Content-type: text/html
Content-length: 78

Please follow <a href="http://www.example.com/">this link</a>.

This response is easier to generate by CGI programs because one does not need to change the default status code.

Here is a simple CGI program that effects this redirect:

print "Refresh: 0; url=http://www.example.com/\r\n";
print "Content-type: text/html\r\n";
print "\r\n";
print "Please follow <a href=\"http://www.example.com/\">this link</a>!"

Note: Usually, the HTTP server adds the status line and the Content-length header automatically.

The W3C discourage the use of meta refresh, since it does not communicate any information about either the original or new resource, to the browser (orsearch engine). The W3C’s Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (7.4) discourage the creation of auto-refreshing pages, since most web browsers do not allow the user to disable or control the refresh rate. Some articles that they have written on the issue include W3C Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (1.0): Ensure user control of time-sensitive content changes, Use standard redirects: don’t break the back button! and Core Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0 section 7.

JavaScript redirects[edit]

JavaScript can cause a redirect by setting the window.location attribute, e.g.:


Normally JavaScript pushes the redirector site’s URL to the browser’s history. It can cause redirect loops when users hit the back button. With the following command you can prevent this type of behaviour.[10]


However, HTTP headers or the refresh meta tag may be preferred for security reasons and because JavaScript will not be executed by some browsers and many web crawlers.

Frame redirects[edit]

A slightly different effect can be achieved by creating a single HTML frame that contains the target page:

<frameset rows="100%">
  <frame src="http://www.example.com/">
    <body>Please follow <a href="http://www.example.com/">link</a>.</body>

One main difference to the above redirect methods is that for a frame redirect, the browser displays the URL of the frame document and not the URL of the target page in the URL bar.

This cloaking technique may be used so that the reader sees a more memorable URL or to fraudulently conceal a phishing site as part of website spoofing.[11]

The same effect can be done with an inline frame:

 height="100%" width="100%" src="http://www.example.com/">
Please follow  href="http://www.example.com/">link.

Redirect chains[edit]

One redirect may lead to another. For example, the URL http://www.wikipedia.com/wiki/URL_redirection (note the domain name) is first redirected tohttp://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/URL redirection and then to the correct URL: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/URL_redirection. This is unavoidable if the different links in the chain are served by different servers though it should be minimised by rewriting the URL as much as possible on the server before returning it to the browser as a redirect.

Redirect loops[edit]

Sometimes a mistake can cause a page to end up redirecting back to itself, possibly via other pages, leading to an infinite sequence of redirects. Browsers should stop redirecting after a certain number of hops and display an error message.

HTTP/1.1 states:

A client SHOULD detect and intervene in cyclical redirections (i.e., “infinite” redirection loops).

Note: An earlier version of this specification recommended a maximum of five redirections ([RFC2068], Section 10.3). Content developers need to be aware that some clients might implement such a fixed limitation.

Note that the URLs in the sequence might not repeat, e.g.: http://www.example.com/1 -> http://www.example.com/2 -> http://www.example.com/3


There exist services that can perform URL redirection on demand, with no need for technical work or access to the web server your site is hosted on.

URL redirection services[edit]

A redirect service is an information management system, which provides an internet link that redirects users to the desired content. The typical benefit to the user is the use of a memorable domain name, and a reduction in the length of the URL or web address. A redirecting link can also be used as a permanent address for content that frequently changes hosts, similarly to the Domain Name System.

Hyperlinks involving URL redirection services are frequently used in spam messages directed at blogs and wikis. Thus, one way to reduce spam is to reject all edits and comments containing hyperlinks to known URL redirection services; however, this will also remove legitimate edits and comments and may not be an effective method to reduce spam.

Recently, URL redirection services have taken to using AJAX as an efficient, user friendly method for creating shortened URLs.

A major drawback of some URL redirection services is the use of delay pages, or frame based advertising, to generate revenue.


The first redirect services took advantage of top-level domains (TLD) such as “.to” (Tonga), “.at” (Austria) and “.is” (Iceland). Their goal was to make memorable URLs. The first mainstream redirect service was V3.com that boasted 4 million users at its peak in 2000. V3.com success was attributed to having a wide variety of short memorable domains including “r.im”, “go.to”, “i.am”, “come.to” and “start.at”. V3.com was acquired by FortuneCity.com, a large free web hosting company, in early 1999.[12] As the sales price of top level domains started falling from $70.00 per year to less than $10.00, use of redirection services declined.

With the launch of TinyURL in 2002 a new kind of redirecting service was born, namely URL shortening. Their goal was to make long URLs short, to be able to post them on internet forums. Since 2006, with the 140 character limit on the extremely popular Twitter service, these short URL services have been heavily used.

Referrer masking[edit]

Redirection services can hide the referrer by placing an intermediate page between the page the link is on and its destination. Although these are conceptually similar to other URL redirection services, they serve a different purpose, and they rarely attempt to shorten or obfuscate the destination URL (as their only intended side-effect is to hide referrer information and provide a clear gateway between other websites.)

This type of redirection is often used to prevent potentially-malicious links from gaining information using the referrer, for example a session ID in the query string. Many large community websites use link redirection on external links to lessen the chance of an exploit that could be used to steal account information, as well as make it clear when a user is leaving a service, to lessen the chance of effective phishing .

Here is a simplistic example of such a service, written in PHP.

$url = htmlspecialchars($_GET['url']);
header( 'Refresh: 0; url=http://'.$url );
<!-- Fallback using meta refresh. -->
  <meta http-equiv="refresh" content="0;url=http://<?php echo $url; ?>">
 Attempting to redirect to <a href="http://<?php echo $url; ?>">http://<?php echo $url; ?></a>.

The above example does not check who called it (e.g. by referrer, although that could be spoofed). Also, it does not check the url provided. This means that a malicious person could link to the redirection page using a url parameter of his/her own selection, from any page, which uses the web server’s resources.

Security issues[edit]

URL redirection can be abused by attackers for phishing attacks, such as open redirect and covert redirect.

“An open redirect is an application that takes a parameter and redirects a user to the parameter value without any validation.”[13]

“Covert redirect is an application that takes a parameter and redirects a user to the parameter value WITHOUT SUFFICIENT validation.”[14] It was disclosed in May 2014 by a mathematical doctoral student Wang Jing from Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.[15]

See also[edit]


  1. Jump up^ “Google revives redirect snoopery”. blog.anta.net. 2009-01-29. ISSN 1797-1993. Archived from the original on 2011-08-17.
  2. Jump up^ “Google’s serious hijack problem – Spammers hijack web site listings in Google”. Pandia.com. 13 September 2004. Archived from the original on 2013-06-05.
  3. Jump up^ “Stop Scrapers From Hijacking your Web Pages”. Lori’s Web Design.com. Retrieved 2013-12-18.
  4. Jump up^ “PHP Redirects: 302 to 301 Rock Solid Robust Solution”. WebSiteFactors.co.uk. Archived from the original on 2012-10-12.
  5. Jump up^ “Module ngx_http_rewrite_module – rewrite”. nginx.org. Retrieved 24 December 2014.
  6. Jump up^ Murenin, Constantine A. (18 February 2013). “A dynamic web-site written wholly in nginx.conf? Introducing mdoc.su!”. nginx@nginx.org (Mailing list). Retrieved24 December 2014.
  7. Jump up^ Murenin, Constantine A. (23 February 2013). “mdoc.su — Short manual page URLs for FreeBSD, OpenBSD, NetBSD and DragonFly BSD”. Retrieved25 December 2014.
  8. Jump up^ Murenin, Constantine A. (23 February 2013). “mdoc.su.nginx.conf”. Retrieved 25 December 2014.
  9. Jump up^ “Google and Yahoo accept undelayed meta refreshs as 301 redirects”. Sebastian’s Pamphlets. 3 September 2007.
  10. Jump up^ “Advanced JavaScript Redirections”. Online Marketing Technologies.
  11. Jump up^ Aaron Emigh (19 January 2005). “Anti-Phishing Technology” (PDF). Radix Labs.
  12. Jump up^ “Net gains for tiny Pacific nation”. BBC News. 2007-09-14. Retrieved 2010-05-27.
  13. Jump up^ “Open Redirect”. OWASP. 16 March 2014. Retrieved 21 December 2014.
  14. Jump up^ “Covert Redirect”. Tetraph. 1 May 2014. Retrieved 21 December 2014.
  15. Jump up^ “Serious security flaw in OAuth, OpenID discovered”. CNET. 2 May 2014. Retrieved 21 December 2014.

External links[edit]

Um comentário em “URL redirection

Deixe um comentário

Preencha os seus dados abaixo ou clique em um ícone para log in:

Logotipo do WordPress.com

Você está comentando utilizando sua conta WordPress.com. Sair /  Alterar )

Foto do Google

Você está comentando utilizando sua conta Google. Sair /  Alterar )

Imagem do Twitter

Você está comentando utilizando sua conta Twitter. Sair /  Alterar )

Foto do Facebook

Você está comentando utilizando sua conta Facebook. Sair /  Alterar )

Conectando a %s